|
|
Asian Venture Investments in Israel
East
Meets ………. East
August
17, 1999
Dr.
Daniel J. Isenberg
President,
Triangle Technologies, and General Partner, Jerusalem Venture Partners
Amir
Pomerantz
Vice-President,
Triangle Technologies
Asian
investors have been conspicuous in Israel by their absence from
it. At least until recently. Since 1995 we have been witness to
a steady increase in Asian investors’ activities in Israel’s technology
sector due to the virtual disappearance of the Arab Boycott and
Israel’s simultaneous emergence as a high technology powerhouse,
at least in the world’s eyes.
The
Three Paths
Since
1995 (more or less), Asian investments in Israeli ventures have
pursued one of three paths:
Direct
financial investments. Examples of these include Nippon Investment
and Finance’s (NIF) investment in Optibase in 1995, Jafco’s investment
in RadGuard in 1998, and Kuang Hwa’s (Taiwan) more recent investment
in SmartLink. Like all financial investors from the West, Asian
financial investors are looking for attractive financial returns.
One difference, however, is that the Asians generally
tend to take a longer time perspective as to their exit. Since the
cost of capital in Japan, for example, is nearly zero, relatively
low IRR’s can still be quite attractive. Official figures are not
available, but we estimate that there have been from $50 million
to $70 million of direct financial investments from Asia.
Direct
strategic investments. Asian investors, especially those from
Japan, have been particularly active in making strategic investments.
Examples include CSK’s investment in Optibase, Nippon Systemware’s
investments in Veon and Emultek (e-sim), and Fujitsu Business Systems’
investment in Zapa Digital Arts. In general, Asian (in particular
Japanese) companies’ goals in making
;strategic
investments diverge from those of their Western counterparts: rather
than using the ;minority investment as a stepping stone to making
an acquisition, Asian strategic investors use minority investment
as a means for strengthening business ties with the investee company,
sending a signal of commitment to the investor’s own organization,
and opening up a window to new technologies and markets. Triangle
Technologies estimates that there have been between $40 million
to $50 million of direct strategic investments from Asia.
Venture
capital fund investments. Compared with their Western counterparts,
Asian investors have been relatively slow to make venture capital
fund investments in Israeli funds, preferring to see exactly where
their investments are going. Nevertheless, with the proliferation
of Israeli funds and the growing renown of Israel’s venture capital
industry, Asian investors are increasingly comfortable with such
indirect investing. Some of the more prominent examples include
Kyocera’s investment in Nitsanim, Mitsui, Jafco, and Nissho Iwai’s
investments in JVP – Jerusalem Venture Partners, NIF, Hotung (Taiwan),
and Kuang Hwa’s investments in Evergreen’s IJT Technology Fund,
Itochu’s investment in DS Polaris II, various private Asian investors’
participation in Link Technologies, China Development Bank’s investment
in Oxton, Mitsubishi’s investment in Veritas, and most recently
reported investments in the new Global Catalyst Fund by Fujitsu
and Sumitomo Electric. Still, the Asian investors in Israel VC funds
expect to gain more from their investment than capital gain – typically
they are looking for business relations with the investees, and
windows to new technologies and markets. Triangle Technologies estimates
that about $70 million of Asian capital has been invested in Israeli
venture capital funds.
The
Search for Technology
Whereas
there is significant overlap between the priority lists for both
Asian and non-Asian investors – Internet technologies and services,
networking devices and software, CRM software, and so on - there
are a few areas of particular priority for Asian investors:
Wireless
telecommunications. In China and other rapidly developing regional
economies there is a strong motivation to bypass the need for expensive
wireline infrastructure and allow access via various wireless technologies.
In general, the dense urban nature of Asian populations gives communications
services a unique element. Furthermore, Japan is leading the implementation
of wideband CDMA services, following NTT’s victory in getting its
W-CDMA standard adopted by the International Telecommunications
Union.
Hardware
components. Compared with their Western (including Israeli)
counterparts, Asian venture capitalists are more oriented towards
investing in hardware components of various kinds, be they related
to various display technologies, optical communications components,
or advanced semiconductor devices. Recently at Triangle Technologies
we received commitments of over $3 million from some of the top
tier venture capitalists in Japan and Asia to invest in an Israeli
developer of a sophisticated sensor device, after the developer
had been turned down in the round by most leading Israeli VC’s.
Once it was clear to the company’s shareholders that there was strong
interest and financial support from Asia, the leading Israeli VC
shareholder decided to lead the round with its own investment, and
the round closed.
Mass
market information appliances. In most categories Japanese and
Asian manufacturers have lost the race to develop next generation
information technologies to US companies – Microsoft, Sun, Intel,
Cisco, EMC, AOL and others have gained world wide dominance in their
respective markets. The Asians have been left far behind. Nevertheless,
one area in which Asian players are winning is at the client device
side – Casio, Sharp, NEC, Sony, Olympus – are all dominating various
related markets of digital cameras, PDA’s, cell phone handsets,
displays, and so on. Taiwan is maintaining its hard won position
as the manufacturing center for the world’s large volume IT needs.
Any technologies that can help Asian companies maintain their toehold
on the rapidly rising cliff of IT will be highly valued, and invested
in.
East
Meets…..East
Israel
has historically been at the pivotal point between Asia and the
West, and in the newnetworked world, Israel can continue to be an
important lynch pin. But how can Israeli ventures benefit from Asian
capital? The answer is not obvious, since the primary market for
most Israeli ventures is the US - why is it so important to
have Asian investors represented?
There
are three benefits of Asian capital:
Money
is money. All capital is useful, although admittedly, some capital
is more useful than others. But of course, this is not convincing,
particularly since many of the attractive investments are oversubscribed
and the investees can construct their own portfolio of shareholders
based on their value added contribution.
Legitimacy.
Investment by a respected Asian institution, be it venture fund,
corporation, or other financial institution, can lend legitimacy
to a new venture. Asians more than Americans are sensitive to context,
and potential Asian business partners are more likely to form business
relations with those foreign companies which bear the stamp of respectful
regional shareholders.
Information
for the investees. Eventually (perhaps sooner rather than later)
the Israeli investeecompanies will enter the Asian market. Information
and market intelligence is critical everywhere, but in a business
culture where Israeli’s have little experience and fewer contacts,
access to reliable
information
about markets, business partners, key executive candidates, can
play a critical role and help avoid major mistakes. Investors often
have better access to such information.
The
Rising Sun
To summarize,
it is well worth it for Israeli companies to raise at least some
capital from good quality Asian investors. It is well worth it for
Asian investors to invest – directly, strategically, or indirectly
– in Israeli opportunities. Through experience and cooperation,
Israeli and Asian partnerscan turn to face each other, and make
manifest the latent synergies between the two .
|